To me I don't care if he has a gun or not. I think from the crack-boom evidence and the way he fell, he was shot from his right side maybe just above his right ear and all the blood from his throat was the exit wound which of course makes sense with a gunshot wound.
The lapel mic on his shirt is what killed Charlie. His security detail is who killed him. The footage is on X and the crack boom evidence is in line with this.
hey ryan, i feel sorry that you have to deal with all the kooks, even in your own comment section. don't let them get to you. instead, focus on the rational, college educated blue pilled people. you can convert them easily, by showing your evidence and intellectual rigour.
(i was one of them).
And that's the elite human capital you wanna convert anyway. You want urban professionals to learn the truth about JFK & 9/11, not uneducated internet losers who think the earth is flat.
Do you think using capital letters everywhere makes you more convincing? Personally, I think if a new video or new information comes out RD should report on such a thing, should he feel compelled.
To me I don't care if he has a gun or not. I think from the crack-boom evidence and the way he fell, he was shot from his right side maybe just above his right ear and all the blood from his throat was the exit wound which of course makes sense with a gunshot wound.
Between the 1 and 4 second mark, I see that he sets something down.
I can see it appears to have some sort of rope or lanyard attached to it (on the L end as I view it.)
I see it has a straight structure underneath what I presume to be a towel.
I cannot discern how long it is other than guessing about 2-2.5 feet in length.
I have to speculate, or use conjecture, to claim it is a gun.
For me, this falls short of proof "you can see the gun".
I cannot bring myself to believe that a kid can be that good of a shot.
You are so right ✅️ it's just square up
The lapel mic on his shirt is what killed Charlie. His security detail is who killed him. The footage is on X and the crack boom evidence is in line with this.
What happened to the pedestrian that disappears in the background ?
People still believe this is the guy are just have no critical thinking
I appreciate your reply. The first sentence was insightful.
Have a good weekend.
Source of the video? I bet you can’t say lol
No I can’t see a Gun.
Was the white vehicle his uber?
Lee Harvey and sirhan sirhan also had guns
hey ryan, i feel sorry that you have to deal with all the kooks, even in your own comment section. don't let them get to you. instead, focus on the rational, college educated blue pilled people. you can convert them easily, by showing your evidence and intellectual rigour.
(i was one of them).
And that's the elite human capital you wanna convert anyway. You want urban professionals to learn the truth about JFK & 9/11, not uneducated internet losers who think the earth is flat.
Do you think using capital letters everywhere makes you more convincing? Personally, I think if a new video or new information comes out RD should report on such a thing, should he feel compelled.
That's why we pay him, no?
Fair enough. What about the second part of my reply? Would you think it better if RD wouldn't revisit a topic if new information comes to light?