To be fair to Chris I agree with him on many things but not this one. That picture is victim blaming.
US's school shooter problem cannot simply be blamed on guns existing. USA has had guns for centuries. It didn't have school shootings until the large rise in recreational drugs and prescription drugs.
It really took off from 1999 onward when they started giving prescription drugs to kids. However shouldn't that correlation hold across the board?
And yet it's not every state even though guns are legal in all states. Vermont for example has had 1 school shooting and it has guns and it also has big Pharma. Also Montana, Wyoming, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, West Virginia, and Maine have had single digit school shootings or none at all.
There are a lot of guns in West Virginia and they have had zero School Shooting deaths. (There was a person disarmed on a bus and a hostage attempt where no shots were fired.) SSRI are legal but people there are less likely to turn to them. Still they are available.
So what is it that is enraging the youth? There is a typical profile. Recently many have been Trans. But the shooters have always been social rejects. What do they all seem to have in common?
His article was ok. He has become more of a preacher than anything else now.
I live under fascism in S. America where the people are not allowed to own guns.
Only the police, military and their gangs.
These leaves social change difficult, for they are fully armed.
No, gun regulation is not the answer.
The society is sick, as you say, on drugs and mind bending social media.
Menticide.
I guess being rejects would be the common factor.