How to do research

Here is something very basic. When you do research, always try to falsify your own position.

Here we have a claim by Hustlebitch one of the Candace Owen’s super fans/coattail riders.

OK this is simply not true. It is a manipulated graph. You can verify it your self by typing in Tyler Robinson Charlie Kirk and you can search France or US or wherever you like.

That is France you notice there is nothing for July 14. Or July at all. This is USA against nothing until September. It says Sep 7th to 13 but if you zoom in all of those are after the 10th after he was shot.

Now that took maybe 10 seconds to falsify. This is why we get stuff like this.

Yeah false. That flight is UTC which is not “Utah Time.” In Utah it was 7am about 4 and a half hours BEFORE Charlie Kirk was shot. But she corrects herself.

She corrects only what she was forced to do then says it is still obviously connected to his death. No it isn’t. It is obviously not connect to his death. But she doubles down.

And then ties it to this

The July meeting crap snaps together with HustleBitch’s lie about google trends. I am convinced he is one of the assholes purposely feeding Candace false information to make her discredit herself. Or someone if feeding it to him and he feeds it to her.

This entire get away plane narrative is nonsense. If you need this explained to you then I just can’t help you. Start by not smoking weed. No one would turn off their transponder unless they want to risk hitting another plane and that doesn’t make you invisible to radar. They know exactly where you are they just cant talk to you. Nothing would draw attention to your plane faster than doing that. .But you see Owens and co don’t think Tyler was a shooter and like the movies the real bad guy had a get away plane that took off 4 and a half hours before the shooting ‘cause reasons.’

It is OK to get things wrong. It is not OK to double down on the stupid when you do get something wrong instead of just saying you made a mistake.

Candace is newly red-pilled. She has a big voice and huge following. She is anti-Zionist. She was one of the only ones early on to defend the Tate brothers. (I was another one). However she also defended Harvey Weinstein. And although wrong this is a good thing because it means she is willing to say what she thinks is true even when it is unpopular. She is not a Russian agent as Fuentes keeps suggesting. Her heart is in the right place. But the woman is not a researcher. They want to discredit her because her criticism of Israel is spot on. So they are putting shit sandwiches in front of her hoping that she will bite. And she did with the Macron’s wife is a man story (she had 3 kids) and she has many times been led astray with Kirk’s death. This post was just one example of the crap they pulled the past two days. It has been a sustained stream of BS ever since Sep 10th.

Don’t get mad at me for telling the truth. Be mad at the people telling you things that are not true. It is not “dividing the movement” to call a spade a spade. Many pro Palestine voices like Anna Kasperian who has been a voice for Palestine for decades, of Norman Finkelstein have been killing it on the Israel issue without anchoring themselves to false conspiracies. No one can accuse me of scoffing at actual conspiracies and definitely no one can accusing me of defending Israel. But you cannot just make things up. Tyler Robinson shot Kirk. Not every shooting is JFK.

This is convincing me the next film has to be on the art of kookafication.