WTC1 came down 1 hour and 42 minutes after being hit; WTC2 was hit after WTC1 and collapsed sooner than WTC1.
So the allegation that there were transcripts of NY fire fighters "concerned about the building was going to collapse" could not have been for hours and hours. From the first hit to the last collapse of WTC1 and 2, it was 1 hour 42 minutes. Or was WTC7 'the building" in question?
The firefighters were also claiming they heard explosion after explosion. So there is that.
As for Jane Stanley saying WTC7 is down, is that just New York hyerbole? Funny, she has a British accent and it's extremely doubtful she speaks in such a NYC fashion. Was mis-information relayed to her? Perhaps.
Further, WTC7 and 'pull it', how does that make any sense? Who is going inside and planting explosives to 'pull it' in such a controlled fashion? Or did they just get lucky?
And what about all the alleged vehicles burned out blocks away? How'd that happen?
Finally, as for these fire collapses, how did asymmetrical damage, heating and structural failures, produce symmetrical collapses of all three WTC buildings? 3 for 3??
Sorry guys, I'm still not convinced, And yes, I have long known about the sprinklers being disabled so that is not a new factor to consider.
If you showed footage of the buildings coming down the day before, I trust everyone would have agreed they were demolitions, not fires.
Great conversation! So refreshing to hear people speaking about 9-11 who actually bothered to dig out the facts rather than simply speculate.
WTC1 came down 1 hour and 42 minutes after being hit; WTC2 was hit after WTC1 and collapsed sooner than WTC1.
So the allegation that there were transcripts of NY fire fighters "concerned about the building was going to collapse" could not have been for hours and hours. From the first hit to the last collapse of WTC1 and 2, it was 1 hour 42 minutes. Or was WTC7 'the building" in question?
The firefighters were also claiming they heard explosion after explosion. So there is that.
As for Jane Stanley saying WTC7 is down, is that just New York hyerbole? Funny, she has a British accent and it's extremely doubtful she speaks in such a NYC fashion. Was mis-information relayed to her? Perhaps.
Further, WTC7 and 'pull it', how does that make any sense? Who is going inside and planting explosives to 'pull it' in such a controlled fashion? Or did they just get lucky?
And what about all the alleged vehicles burned out blocks away? How'd that happen?
Finally, as for these fire collapses, how did asymmetrical damage, heating and structural failures, produce symmetrical collapses of all three WTC buildings? 3 for 3??
Sorry guys, I'm still not convinced, And yes, I have long known about the sprinklers being disabled so that is not a new factor to consider.
If you showed footage of the buildings coming down the day before, I trust everyone would have agreed they were demolitions, not fires.